Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Funny

Trump Shakes Putin’s Hand And Everyone Immediately Noticed What He Did With His Other Hand

Everything about this is perfect.

Published

on

President Donald Trump made history again for having another epic handshake. It wasn’t that long ago that he sent shockwaves throughout the political realm as Trump shook hands with Kim Jong-un in a historic meeting hoping to help settle differences between North and South Korea and put a rest to the nuclear weapons nonsense that’s been going on over there under Kim’s leadership. Trump’s latest history-making handshake was with Russia’s leader Vladimir Putin. This handshake caused the news networks and independent reporting outlets to tremble again after it was noticed what Putin did with his other hand in the middle of the handshake.

The two world leaders were sitting in their chair and leaned in for the historic handshake. President Trump is known to have some alpha-male extra strong handshakes and Putin was ready for it. Putin, who’s about 5″5′ on a good day braced himself for the handshake because he didn’t want to be overpowered for the 6″3′ Trump. What did Putin do with his other hand? He held on to the chair while Trump grabbed him like a small kitten and pulled him in. Putin held on for dear life, grasping the chair so he didn’t get pulled out of it and fall on the floor on television or video.

Just think, if Putin hadn’t held on, then he might have hit the floor! This is absolutely hilarious and it’s proof that Trump and Russia aren’t fooling around together. Anyone claiming that there is Russian collusion with President Trump or his team, then they are blindly running into the Democrat agenda without looking where they’re going or how silly they sound while making up false news.

“Donald Trump’s practically patented the power handshake.

But self-styled hardman Vladimir Putin is a tough match even for the US President.

Other world leaders have been wrong-footed by Trump’s style, where he yanks his sparring partner’s hand towards him.

So it’s no surprise the Russian President, whose regime is accused of a nerve agent m****r on UK soil, came prepared today.

Lo and behold, Putin appeared to be bracing himself firmly against his chair with his left hand as he shook hands with Trump at their summit in Helsinki.

The veins even came up in the Russian President’s ‘gripping’ hand as he kept a solemn look and nodded once at Trump, firmly.

In the end it seemed Putin had nothing to fear as Trump was in good spirits – even appearing to give Putin a wink.

The US President described the Russian World Cup as “one of the best ever” adding: “In the US we call it ‘soccer’, I watched quite a bit of it and I watched the entire final, the semi-finals, and they were really spectacular games.

“But it was beautifully done, so congratulations.”

Those who had their arms wrestled away by the bellicose reality star have included Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

Others fought back, with France’s Emannuel Macron enjoy an astonishing 29-second handshake with the President as they tried to out-macho each other last year.

Trump also met his match last week in the Queen’s 85-year-old Lady in Waiting Virginia Ogilvy, who turned the tables by yanking the President’s hand towards her.”

President Trump was also facing some minor backlash by people searching for a story when they claimed he purposely walked in front of the Queen. That’s also incorrect as he can be seen simply walking and not really sure which way she was going. It was like when two people walking toward each other both go left, then both go right and everyone laughs. It’s completely innocent, accidental, and funny. Meanwhile, the liberals and hateful anti-Trumpers will just make up stories about every little thing that he does because that’s all they are good at.

The liberal media has started making up stories about things that don’t exist, hoping to get one of their spun stories to pick up popularity and spread a message of nonsense. For example, Huff Post posted a Tweet that literally made no sense and talked about a story that didn’t even exist. They were creating it. They must have run out of things to write that day and simply made up a story about Trump in an elevator. Obviously the guy has been in an elevator before. What does he do in there? He goes up and down, just like everyone else.

People are still losing their mind over Trump and we just keep laughing and making America great again. All those Democrats claiming Russian collusion are wrong and will always be wrong. Trump wants to be friends with Russia, but we don’t need Russians to influence our votes.

The Trump deranged Democrats are the Republicans best asset! We know who to vote for and it’s not some far-fetched anti-American on the left.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Culture

Melania Just Broke Her Silence On Trump-Trashing Omarosa And Drops The Hammer Hard!

Here comes the Boom!

Published

on

From the first time I saw President Trump hit the campaign trail, I never doubted that he adored Melania and she felt nothing but love and admiration for him. The left has constantly tried to allege that their marriage is in disarray and that Melania is getting ready to leave Trump at any moment. President Trump’s former aide, Omarosa Manigault Newman, became one of the left’s minions in her new book “Unhinged,” where she claimed that the Trumps were on the verge of divorce.

At first, Melania seemed to have nothing much to say about the accusation. Her silence is now over and she’s dropping the hammer hard on the allegations by Omarosa. Melania’s office has issued a statement that solidly refutes claims by Omarosa that she is seeking a divorce from Trump. The statement suggests that Omarosa should be more grateful for the opportunities afforded to her by President Trump. There’s no arguing with that. Not only did Trump have her repeatedly on The Apprentice, he brought her on his White House team when her qualifications certainly didn’t merit it. He gave her a chance to serve her country and instead, she is serving herself.

Omarosa is a TV celebrity, not a marriage counselor. But that doesn’t stop her from trying to play one in real life. Evidently, the book insinuates that due to Trump’s alleged affairs, Melania can’t wait to dump him. That’s just laughable. “In my opinion, Melania is counting every minute until he is out of office and she can divorce him,” the former aide wrote. Then she really stepped over the line by suggesting that if the first lady were to divorce Trump while he was in office, he might counter by negating her citizenship. He can’t do that and anyone who knows anything about the law and the Constitution would tell you that. She’s just making stuff up and it’s not only entirely false, it’s disgusting.

Omarosa was obviously furious that Kelly fired her and that Trump let it happen. She’s being childish and petulant about it. Frankly, Kelly did the right thing. She thinks very highly of herself and because she feels she was slighted, she is turning on someone who was a very good friend to her. Way to bite the hand that feeds you.

Omarosa went on to address Melania’s fashion choices, which far outclass the TV reality star’s own fashion sense. She went after the “I really don’t care, do you?” jacket incident and had the nerve to claim it was meant to punish President Trump. Again, there is nothing to back that up and it doesn’t even make sense. I believe that happened after she left the White House so how would she even know? “I believe Melania uses style to punish her husband,” Omarosa writes. “At any time, if she so desired, she could humiliate him in public with small, ambiguous gestures, just as he’d openly humiliated her with his affairs and lascivious behavior for years.” Omarosa has no idea what Melania thinks and she has no right to pretend she does. She claims that she had a great connection with Melania. I highly doubt that assertion.

It didn’t take long for Melania to shoot down those claims. Her office indicated that they never really interacted with each other at all. Melania’s Communication Director Stephanie Grisham made that crystal clear by saying that the first lady “rarely, if ever, interacted” with Manigault Newman. Why would she? Their paths would not cross as Omarosa was an aide to Trump, not Melania. They certainly weren’t close friends. Grisham continued speaking for Melania, “It’s disappointing to her that she is lashing out and retaliating in such a self-serving way, especially after all the opportunities given to her by the president.” Very, very true.

Omarosa signed a non-disclosure agreement when she went to work in the White House. She has obviously broken the terms of that agreement and I would wager she is going to have legal troubles over all of this. And she should. This is not reality TV, this is the presidency and your actions have consequences. But her legal woes may not end there. A number of people that Omarosa has claimed were involved in incidents with the president are claiming that she is not telling the truth. She is making accusations with no proof to back them up and that will not end well for Omarosa. Her recording White House officials in the Situation Room is also something that will get her in legal hot water.

Kellyanne Conway’s husband, George Conway, is nixing a story about President Trump using racial epithets in addressing him. Pollster Frank Luntz also stated that Omarosa did not tell the truth when he was named as an individual who had heard President Trump use the n-word. “I’m in [Omarosa’s] book on page 149,” Lutz tweeted. “She claims to have heard from someone who heard from me that I heard Trump use the N-word. Not only is this flat-out false (I’ve never heard such a thing), but Omarosa didn’t even make an effort to call or email me to verify. Very shoddy work.”

I haven’t heard anyone from the White House, that has left or is there presently, that backs up Omarosa’s claims. Not one bit. A furious President Trump tweeted praise for General John Kelly firing her, “When you give a crazed, crying lowlife a break, and give her a job at the White House, I guess it just didn’t work out. Good work by General Kelly for quickly firing that dog!” Melania probably seconds that sentiment wholeheartedly. I know I do.

Continue Reading

Funny

Viewers Floored By What Happened After Fox News Host Ate Steak In Front Of Ultra-Liberal Vegan

The look in her eyes was pure evil!!

Published

on

Jesse Watters had some fun when he invited a doctoral candidate on his show to debate her about the effects of eating meat. His guest was Anne Delassio-Parson and she’s a candidate for getting her Ph.D candidate at Penn State. Her big thing? She thought that eating meat reinforced gender stereotypes. Sounds pretty stupid, right? Don’t worry, it gets better. The thought was that eating meat supports a “hegemonic masculinity” or a “meat-centric culture” but that’s also fairly unintelligent, right? It is because men and women both enjoy eating meat products and no one really looks at another man or woman and thinks anything different of them, of course, unless you’re a liberal with some strange identity problem.

Usually what happens is a man and woman decide what they want to eat and no one else really cares unless they’re eating monkey brains or something totally exotic that’s out of the norm. If a girl wants a double cheeseburger or a salad, then more power to them. If a guy wants to chomp a steak or have a milkshake, then more power to him. No one cares.

Either way, eating meat somehow became the topic of this bizarre woman who doesn’t seem to be the best product of Penn State. She’s certainly a better representative than Jerry Sandusky, but that’s not very hard to do.

They then talked about “doing vegetarianism” and “de-linking” meat from gender hegemony and all I could think of was “who cares?” Not me. I’m pretty sure no one living their life in any state of normalcy would care about the nonsense that this lady is spewing.

Here’s where it gets even better. Jesse Watters ate a steak right in front of her. BOOM! Absolutely hilarious and if it’s cooked any more than medium rare, then he better send it back. What’s better than that? The fact that it was recorded. Watch the Jesse Watters steak video below, then tilt your head back and laugh. Just remember folks – eat whatever you want. No one cares. It’s your life and your belly. Eat whatever makes you happy, but not so much that it makes you an obese Trump hating complainer like Michael Moore.

Fox News: “Jesse Watters on Saturday debated a doctoral candidate from Penn State University, who contended that eating meat reinforces gender stereotypes.

As FoxNews.com reported, Anne DeLessio-Parson published an article in the “Journal of Feminist Geography” after studying Argentina’s “meat-centric culture.”

An academic journal has published an article by a Ph.D. candidate at Pennsylvania State University that argues eating meat maintains a society where “hegemonic masculinity” is the norm.

“I contend that in such a context, we cannot separate the ways people ‘do vegetarianism’ from how they ‘do gender,’” Anne DeLessio-Parson wrote. “Doing vegetarianism in interactions drives social change, contributing to the de-linking of meat from gender hegemony and revealing the resisting and reworking of gender in food spaces.”

DeLessio-Parson theorizes that being a vegetarian in the South American nation is a political act that contributes to the destabilization of the gender binary, or the view that there are only two sexes, masculine and feminine.

“[V]egetarians defy attempts to hold them accountable to gendered social expectations,” she wrote. “Women, for example, assert authority over their diets; men embody rejection of the meat-masculinity nexus by adopting a worldview that also rejects sexism and racism.”

On “Watters’ World,” Watters challenged her on the claim, and enjoyed a late-night snack during the debate.

DeLessio-Parson said Watters was slightly incorrect when he said consuming meat “creates toxic masculinity” because the phenomenon is “already there.”

She said it “reinforces certain social structures, including patriarchy” through its “symbolism.”

Watters then produced some symbolism of his own, as a producer laid a plate of steak — “medium rare” — in front of him.

“Is this bad — that I’m eating meat?” he asked.

DeLessio-Parson said it would be more acceptable if he hunted or procured the meat himself, rather than “enjoying the benefit [with] the blood on someone else’s hands.”

“What if you’re just hungry, and the animals are there for us to enjoy?” he asked.”

Continue Reading

Thanks for sharing!

We'd like to invite you to become a RWN insider. Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Send this to a friend