Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Unfolding Now: Somali Refugee Couple With Terror Ties Caught In Massive Lie – Too Late Now



The failures of Obama’s regime’s policies continue to be exposed, as yet another refugee couple was arrested by authorities in Tuscon, Arizona. The couple is now facing numerous charges of falsifying immigration documents, including lying to federal officials about the husband’s involvement with an African terrorist organization.

28-year-old Mohamed Abdirahman Osman is accused of eight counts of supplying false information on immigration documents. His wife, 25-year-old Zeinab Abdirahman Mohamed is facing three counts of providing false information in support of Osman as they sought refugee status.  While living in China in 2013, the couple applied for and were granted refugee status in 2014 and entered the United States. They have been living in Tucson since that time. In June 2015, Osman and Mohamed submitted applications for Legal Permanent Residence Status to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

That indictment reveals Osman gave false information regarding both his name and his nationality – he told immigration authorities he originated from Somalia when he actually was originally from Ethiopia. Specifically, the indictment filed against the couple states – the “material submitted in support of their refugee applications and their applications for Legal Permanent Residence Status contained false, fictitious, and fraudulent statements.”

Trending: Criminal Evidence On Hillary Judge Sends Earthquake Through Democrat Swamp

He also denied any association with terrorist organizations, yet the indictment states Osman later admitted he was recruited to join the known terrorist group – al-Shabab. As a result of that recruitment he moved from Jijiga to Mogadishu, Somalia, at the direction of al-Shabab. He also admitted to knowing several prominent members of the al-Shabab organization.

Who is al-Shabab? They are a jihadist fundamentalist group based in East Africa. In 2012, the terror group pledged allegiance to the militant Islamist organization Al-Qaeda. The group is self-described as waging jihad against “enemies of Islam”, and is currently engaged in active combat against the Federal Government of Somalia, as well as the African Union Mission to Somalia (AMISOM).  Roughly translated ‘”The Youth” or “The Youngsters,” Al-Shabaab has been designated as a terrorist organization by Australia, Canada, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and the United States.  As of June 2012, the US State Department has open bounties on several of the group’s senior commanders.

Osman is also accused of lying to immigration officers about injuries sustained in a bomb blast in a Somali market in 2010. According to the indictment, prosecutors state he was actually injured the year prior in 2009 while handling explosives. In short, Osman and his wife are accused of lying about his ties to the terrorist group al-Shabab, his name, his nationality, his father’s name, a brother whom the government identifies as an al-Shabab associate, and that he presented a fraudulent Somali passport to obtain immigration benefits.

Osman remains detained pending trial after Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Rateau ruled that although prosecutors did not “prove by clear and convincing evidence” that he is a danger to the community, it did demonstrate he is a significant flight risk.

Rateau states – “Given the nature and seriousness of the offense charged, the weight of the evidence against the defendant and the defendant’s family and community ties, the court finds that no combination of conditions exist that would reasonably assure defendant’s appearance at future court proceedings.”

The Arizona Daily Star reports –

“Osman, together with his wife, fled Somalia after he lost both of his hands and vision in one eye during a 2010 bomb attack. Then, the couple was kidnapped by Al-Shabab and held hostage in an abandoned milk factory.

Osman paid $500 to be smuggled to Beijing via Kenya, where he was given a Somali passport with a visa for China, FBI special agent Benjamin Trentlage, part of the Joint Terrorism Task Force, testified. The couple lived in Beijing for three years before applying and getting refugee status to resettle in Tucson in 2014 with their daughter.

Osman has told different stories about what happened, including how he lost his hands, to different people. And he seems to have issues telling the truth, Assistant U.S. Attorney Beverly Anderson told the judge.

The couple gave differing stories during their interview for legal permanent residency in 2017, Trentlage said. In the interview, conducted in English and without an interpreter, Osman told immigration officers he lost his hands during a bomb explosion at the Bakara market in Mogadishu, the capital of Somalia while working nearby. Later, the couple, along with Osman’s father, were kidnapped by the terrorist group for two to four months until they escaped during fighting between Somali government forces and Al-Shabaab.

Anderson pointed out Osman didn’t ask for an interpreter nor said he didn’t understand during the interview.

His wife gave a similar story about how he got injured, Trentlage told the court, but said they had been held captive for less than a month, didn’t mentioned anything about her father-in-law and said they were able to walk out after Somali government forces intervened, which the government considered to be significant differences in their stories.

During a search of the couple’s apartment last year, agents found cell phones and documents, including a type of school report card from Ethiopia with Osman’s name and photo, and what Trentlage referred to as a study guide. It was a piece of paper with dates, names, and cities that Osman drafted to prepare his wife for her immigration interview.

A month later, the FBI returned to the couple’s home and Trentlage said they interviewed Osman in English and he admitted that his real name was not Arale, gave his father’s real name and listed all of his siblings, including the brother the government says, has ties to Al-Shabaab. Osman also told agents he had been recruited by the terrorist group, although he didn’t become an active member, and that he lost his hands while handling a homemade explosive in 2009.

The prosecution alleges Osman has maintained communication with relatives considered to be associates of Al-Shabaab and sent back about $10,000 a year to family since.”

The arrest and subsequent indictment of the Osmans continue to expose the inherent flaws with the refugee resettlement program, despite former President Barrack Obama’s claims to the contrary. He repeatedly stated that refugees are put through a rigorous vetting process, leaving no stone unturned in finding out just who they are, their affiliations, and their backgrounds. Except evidence is mounting to the contrary and as those stones are turned over rampant fraud is being revealed.

At the 2015 G-20 summit in Turkey, Obama stated resistance to his agenda of refugee resettlement is “shameful” and “un-American.”

“Slamming the door in their faces would be a betrayal of our values, Obama said.

But is it really? American “values” are not some sort of suicide pact and the increase in attacks on American soil, as well as the rampant fraud being revealed within the refugee resettlement program, lend credence to current President Donald Trump’s claims for the necessity of REAL extreme vetting. Concerns about the security of the American citizenry is not illogical.

First and foremost, the Obama talking point about “vetting” these refugees is the greatest insult to the intelligence of American voters since the promise that illegal aliens who receive amnesty will pay back taxes, plus a fine for breaking U.S. immigration law. There has been no meaningful vetting, as Homeland Security itself has admitted to Congress.

Hearings in Tuscon for Osman illustrate the difficulty in finding facts in these type of cases, including whether Mohamed Abdirahman Osman is even his real name. The deadline for a plea in the case is August 31, 2018, and the trial is set to begin on September 18.


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PRICELESS! Parkland Activist And ‘March For Our Lives’ Co-Founder QUITS, Now Regrets Everything



It was about time the anti-Second Amendment Parkland student activists started to wake up and grew out of the temper tantrum they have been throwing since that horrible, but totally avoidable day, Valentines Day 2018 shooting.

Chicks On The Right is now reporting that one of the victim/activists Cameron Kasky may be in fact be starting to wake up. As it turns out, the young co-founder of March for Our Lives movement and is now starting to admit that he, and others, did make mistakes in the process.

Kasky told Fox News Radio’s Guy Benson and Marie Harf that he left the organization and he regrets mistakes he made.

Here is some of what he said to Fox News Radio:

“On going after Senator Rubio at the town hall: I’m very regretful of a lot of the mistakes that I’ve made along the way. One of the things I never really did was watch myself. If I was on a screen I kind of tried to run away from it. I’m not entirely sure why. But, looking back on that it’s like you said, you touched off on this very well in the intro, I’m not going to kick myself for it because I’m 17. Despite the fact that I thought I did at the time, I don’t know everything. But, I look back on that and I say, you know what, there were people who had just been buried and when you’re looking at somebody that you find might in some way have been complicit in this murderer obtaining the weapon it’s hard not to say something like that. But, I went into that wanting less conversation and more to embarrass Rubio and that was my biggest flaw. (3:00)

On if he would redo his question to Rubio: Certainly, and I even name dropped the murder, which at the time I never really thought about, but looking back it ticks me off so much when people do that because then you’re getting that person’s name out there and making them a celebrity. I mean that’s one of the worst things you see come out of these horrific mass murders is name recognition. These people are very often crying out for some sort of attention and power and entitlement and then you’re making them a household name. I feel in some ways responsible for that. (5:13)

On his plans going forward: This summer when March For Our Lives went on the summer tour that we embarked on I met that person in Texas whose got that semi-automatic weapon because that’s how they like to protect their family. I met the 50 some odd percent of woman who are pro-life, even though I thought it was preposterous that a woman could be pro-life and not pro-choice at the time. I learned that a lot of our issues politically come from a lack of understanding of other perspectives and also the fact that so often young conservatives and young liberals will go into debate, like I said earlier, trying to beat the other one as oppose to come to an agreement…I’m working on some efforts to encourage bipartisanship or at least discussion that is productive and help a lot of people avoid the mistakes that I made. (6:33)

On his current relationship with March for Our Lives: I left the March. I’m off the board. I left the organization and if I thought that my friends and the people I worked with couldn’t do it without me I would not have done that, but alas all of our efforts looking forward looked like they didn’t really need my involvement and while I could have helped it wasn’t crucial. You know what I thought in some of the platforms that I have for only the worst reasons is something I really believe in, because I’m a Spider man fan, and I can tell you with great platform comes great responsibility. I thought it was my responsibility to take all the things I was kicking myself for and to encourage others to avoid it. (8:12)

On his new podcast “Cameron Knows Nothing”: My whole message is I was dropped up as an expert. The whole message was these kids are the real experts. Look, I have some very intelligent friends. Some friends who can intellectually run circles around me, but I’m not the expert in pretty much anything. (9:30)”

What most stands out about what this student said is that he admitted regretting how he attacked Senator Marco Rubio from Florida during the infamous staged CNN town hall where Sheriff Israel took the opportunity to deflect from the fact that his own department failed the students by instead blaming politicians, the NRA and our gun laws. He later went on to add that he is planning to talk to Senator Rubio next month.

Although people are questioning what happened to make him change his tune I don’t think it should be much of a mystery. He is a young student, just like all the rest, and he went through a traumatic experience.

An experience that should have never happened and would have never happened if only the sheriff department would have done their job and seen the shooter was a problem when they were called out to his house 39 times. One of those times he even called the police on himself because he thought he would snap and go on a shooting spree at the school.

Whatever happened to change Kasky’s mind, we need to welcome it and hope the rest start seeing the light through all the hate and propaganda they are spewing.

Here’s the time Kasky asked Senator Rubio if he would stop taking NRA money.

Continue Reading

HUGE Message To Kavanaugh Accuser Flying High In The Sky Over Her House



As of today, it is being reported that Dr. Christine Blasey Ford will testify in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday or Thursday of next week. The details and arrangements are still vague but Judge Kavanaugh is eager to clear his name. I’m eager to see this whole circus end so we can get on with the confirmation process.

Pilot David Siever flew a plane on September 20th over the psychology professor’s house with a giant banner attached that read, “Thank you, Christine, We have your back.” That was a huge message of support for Ford. It would seem there are a lot of women who are supporting her in all of this even though, in my opinion, her credibility is comparable to swiss cheese.

UltraViolet, a women’s rights group paid for the flight and the banner. The plane flew over gathered protesters who were marching to Ford’s home as a show of support for her after she accused Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault. There were approximately three dozen women in the protest group and a few men as well.

This same group had already written a “Dear Christine” letter that many of them signed this week in support of the Palo Alto professor. The group linked arms as they marched in front of her home and chanted, “Protect Christine! Protect Christine.” The rally was cobbled together at the last moment and protesters were mostly comprised of Palo Alto mothers and neighbors showing solidarity for Christine Blasey Ford.

Ford has also been celebrated and supported in the #MeToo movement. She is also allegedly the victim of harassment and death threats. However, her local supporters are all in for her. “We believe Christine,” they chanted. “Her story is our story!”

This particular rally was yet another effort to support Ford after she came forward in an article in the Washington Post to share her identity and her allegations against Kavanaugh.

But what these people don’t address is the fact that she can’t recall the year it happened, where it happened, when it happened, who hosted the party, who was there, who brought her or who took her home. Frankly, I’m not buying it.

Ford is claiming that sometime in the early 1980s, Kavanaugh was “stumbling drunk” when he and a friend forced her into a bedroom at a high school party, then groped her, tried to strip off her clothes and put his hand over her mouth to muffle her screams. One of his friends, Mark Judge, interrupted the assault, she alleges, giving her the chance to flee.

Kavanaugh is denying all of this and says it never happened. So is Mark Judge. Originally, Ford was insisting that before she would testify an FBI investigation had to be done. She changed that and then insisted that Kavanaugh testify first, not be in the room when she testifies, that no attorneys be present and that Mark Judge be subpoenaed to testify.

The Senate Judiciary Committee balked and said that they do not subpoena witnesses. They also pointed out that Kavanaugh should testify after Ford so he can answer charges against him and face his accuser. He also has a right to counsel in all this. Ford has still not said exactly what terms she agrees to for testifying next week.

A candlelight vigil on a Palo Alto street corner is planned for Sunday night. Letters of support are being stuffed into her mailboxes at home and at her office, and a GoFundMe page has been set up to help pay Ford’s legal bills.

Ford’s actual testimony next week is still very much in doubt:

“Fox News was told that Debra Katz, one of the lawyers representing Ford, requested that a hearing be set for Thursday — a request the Republicans on the committee had initially rejected, offering Wednesday instead.

“Grassley did not immediately respond to the letter, but a senior White House official told Fox News that it represented a request to continue negotiations about the terms on which she testifies without any firm commitment.

“It’s a clever way to push off the vote Monday without committing to appear Wednesday,” the official said.

“Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, who sits on the committee, tweeted that “we are no closer to hearing from Dr. Ford than we were when her lawyers said Dr. Ford was willing to testify during their media tour 6 days ago.'”

I am highly suspicious of this eleventh-hour victim coming forward with an unsubstantiated claim from 36 years ago against Kavanaugh. It seems she has a number of supporters but I would say there are far more out there that have a problem with her story. I guess we will know more when and if she testifies.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend