Never, ever ask a question of President Trump that you don’t want a blunt, honest answer to. The crisis on the southern border was not created by Trump. It has been simmering for decades and our leaders just kept kicking it down the road for the next administration to deal with. The Democrats loved that because it made it possible for them to further their open borders agenda. They almost did it too under Barack Obama. If they had succeeded in throwing our borders open, thereby destroying our sovereignty, they would have had millions of illegal immigrants who would have become leftist voters overnight and would keep the Democrats in power possibly forever. If Hillary Clint had been elected, that would have been a reality.
Then President Trump came on the scene and turned the left’s dreams of conquering America for Marxists into ash. And things just aren’t going the way the Democrats have demanded. On Monday, after a U.S. District Court judge rejected the Trump administration’s request to amend the Flores agreement of 1997 to keep illegal immigrant families together, President Trump was asked about a “solution” to the longstanding southern border issue. He didn’t hesitate in answering either: “Tell people not to come to our country illegally. That’s the solution,” Trump stated. That was the perfect response.
“Don’t come to our country illegally,” continued the president. “Come like other people do, come legally. I’m saying this very simply: We have laws, we have borders; don’t come to our country illegally. It’s not a good thing.” Then Trump shredded Democrats for their ‘Abolish ICE’ crusade. “The people who are fighting ICE — it’s a disgrace. These people go into harm’s way. There is nobody under greater danger than the people from ICE,” he said. Trump was making a point of the agents’ responsibility to handle MS-13, who is a dangerous, murderous immigrant gang. “We ought to support ICE, not do what the Democrats are doing,” continued Trump.
“Well, I have a solution: Tell people not to come to our country illegally. That's the solution: Don't come to our country illegally. Come like other people do—come legally. I'm saying this very simply: We have laws, we have borders. Don't come to our country illegally.” pic.twitter.com/kiwB8rJVDl
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 10, 2018
“Democrats want open borders and they don’t want crime. We want no crime and we want borders,” Trump stated. “And remember this,” said Trump before taking off, “without borders, you do not have a country.” He is absolutely right and I have said that very same thing for many years now. If Democrats insist on making ‘Abolish ICE’ their 2020 campaign slogan, they will lose big time. Three-quarters of Americans want secure borders and legal immigration. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) has called for the abolition of ICE and top prospective Democratic presidential candidates Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) have been making similarly radical calls. Many other Democrats, celebrities, and leftists have followed suit. They don’t know a catastrophically losing horse when they see one.
None of this should even be an issue. It’s incredibly simple… if you want to come to the U.S., do so legally. Follow the law. But the left insists on having no regard for the Rule of Law, police, the military or agencies such as ICE. That makes them criminals as well and in my book, they should be treated as such. President Trump has a spine of steel and is standing firm on the border issue. He means what he says and he says what he means. It’s not rocket science.
I love the way that Steven Crowder approaches this subject:
“America already has a legal immigration policy in place, which takes into account refugees. So everyone in media, and everyone not in media, crying rivers of tears over how ILLEGAL immigrants are treated, need to find a body of water. Even a puddle will do. Examine the water closely. Check for mosquitoes. Then dive head first into it. Breathe it in. Deeply.
“Trump’s biggest campaign talking point was to build the wall, to stem the flow of illegal immigrants flooding across our borders. Trump got elected. Trump, from most appearances at least, is trying to do something about illegal immigration. While the media splatters its feelings all over television, the internet, and onto every squishy-spined, thoughtless dolt who will carry their message. But America has borders and immigration laws for a reason. If you’re an illegal immigrant who doesn’t like those laws, tough toenails. Cry about them in your own country. Leave ours for people willing to follow laws.”
We are a nation of laws and always have been. Keep families together, no argument here, just deport them together, or better yet, don’t allow them entry in the first place. My son-in-law from Denmark came here legally. It took a few years and he was separated from my daughter for a bit, but we followed the rules and the law and he came here legally. He’s now a real American citizen. It took effort and the desire to do so, something most illegal aliens lack. I have personally offered to help mentor a number of them so they can become citizens, but they want no part of it. They’d rather live off free benefits and pretend they still live in their country of origin.
Trump is right: if you want to come here, then do it legally or don’t bother at all.
After Major Upset In Texas Election, The 2018 Wave Is Confirmed
So much for the so-called “Blue Wave” in the November midterms!
So it seems like the scheme the left had of planting illegal immigrants in dark red strongholds all over America in the hopes of turning the whole nation into a far left socialist cesspool, like Cuba or Venezuela, is starting to show signs of failure.
100 Percent FedUp reported that earlier this week Democrats all over the nation, along with their complicit mainstream media and Hollywood celebrities, got what can be considered a knock out blow when Pete Flores, who is a Hispanic Republican and newcomer to the world of politics, won handily in a district that has been solidly blue for 139 years.
That’s right, a Hispanic Republican took over a district that has voted Democrat for the past 139 years. Texas voters elected Flores to the Texas State Senate and in turn, flipped the district red. An event which has cemented the Republicans supermajority in the chamber ahead of the November elections.
Here is more via the Texas Tribune:
“Republican Pete Flores’ upset victory in a Democratic-friendly Texas Senate district Tuesday night has spurred GOP jubilation and Democratic soul-searching with less than two months until the November elections.
“All this talk about a ‘blue wave’? Well, the tide is out,” Republican Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick proclaimed at Flores’ election night party in San Antonio.
“Flores beat Democrat Pete Gallego, a former U.S. representative, by 6 percentage points in the special election runoff for Senate District 19, where state Sen. Carlos Uresti, D-San Antonio, resigned earlier this year after 11 felony convictions. The win made Flores the first Hispanic Republican in the Texas Senate and grew the GOP majority there to 21 members, a key addition as the caucus heads toward November looking to retain its supermajority.
“Democrats moved quickly Tuesday night to blame Gov. Greg Abbott for scheduling the special election at a time when turnout was expected to be low and would favor his party. But they were nonetheless demoralized Wednesday, trying to figure out how they let a valuable seat flip in a district where Uresti repeatedly won re-election by double digits and that Hillary Clinton carried by 12 in 2016.
“Gallego’s campaign said that at the end of the day, it was not able to motivate its voters as much as Flores did.
“Our investment was in the grassroots and trying to increase the number of Democratic voters in the densest precincts where people hadn’t turned out and trying to cut through the clutter of all the other campaigns going on targeting November … and it proved to be a lot more difficult to get people tuned in to the fact that an incredibly important race was happening today,” Gallego strategist Christian Archer said.
“The relative enthusiasm for Flores was evident in the district’s biggest Republican counties — places like Medina County, where he routed Gallego with 80 percent of the vote. Flores’ margins in the red counties were more than enough to offset Gallego’s advantage in vote-rich Bexar County, which gave Gallego a modest 54 percent of the vote.
“Flores’ campaign said it benefited from a number of factors throughout the race, starting with the deep Democratic divide that unfolded as Gallego battled state Rep. Roland Gutierrez, D-San Antonio, ahead of the eight-way July 31 special election. Gutierrez, who won Bexar County then, never endorsed Gallego in the runoff, and on Wednesday, the two sides had different accounts of how much of an effort, if any, Gallego made to court Gutierrez.
“But Flores also had to prove himself within his own party and emerge as the consensus candidate on July 31, when two other, lesser-known Republicans were on the ballot. Flores pulled that off with just days to spare, earning late endorsements from a who’s who of top Texas Republicans, starting with U.S. Sen. John Cornyn and then Patrick, U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, and Abbott.
“We knew that if we could get in the runoff, we’d have additional help because the stakes would be clear … and the value of winning would be obvious,” said Matt Mackowiak, Flores’ consultant.”
Flores is a retired game warden. He went on to defeat U.S. Representative Pete Gallego for the Senate District 19 seat after receiving support from some of the state’s most prominent politicians. Some of which were Texas Governor Greg Abbott, Lt. Governor Dan Patrick, and both U.S. Senators John Cornyn and Ted Cruz.
According to the Texas Secretary of State’s website, Flores won with a whopping 53 percent of the vote to Gallego’s 47 percent with 44,487 total ballots cast. Flores and Gallego both competed in Tuesday’s runoff after emerging from an eight-candidate field in first and second place in July’s special election to replace former Senator Carlos Uresti.
The longtime Democrat lawmaker was forced to resign his seat in June after being convicted of 11 felony charges.
Democrats Just Set Washington Swamp On Fire With Supreme Court Confession
At the very last moment on the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearings for his appointment to the Supreme Court, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) produced a letter from an alleged victim who was claiming that she was sexually assaulted by Kavanaugh. Kavanaugh has ardently denied this and the whole story is just full of holes and unfounded accusations meant to stall his nomination.
Professor Christina Blasey Ford and the Democrats have caused a national outcry over their machinations here concerning an alleged incident that occurred 36 years ago while Kavanaugh and Ford were in high school. It is more than highly suspicious that this woman would show up now and with no attendant evidence or witnesses who are willing to confirm her accusation.
In fact, at least one witness is saying that this never even happened. The man identified as the witness in an alleged sexual assault by Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh in the 1980s is claiming he has “no memory” of the incident.
“I did not ask to be involved in this matter nor did anyone ask me to be involved,” Mark Judge, a former high school friend, and classmate of Kavanaugh said in a statement Tuesday afternoon. “The only reason I’m involved is because Dr. Christine Blasey Ford remembers me as the other person in the room during the alleged assault.”
“I have no memory of the alleged incident,” Judge said in a statement. “Brett Kavanaugh and I were friends in high school but I do not recall the party described in Ford’s letter. More to the point, I never saw Brett act in the manner Dr. Ford describes.”
Ford can’t seem to remember any specifics of the incident either. She can’t recall the exact year, where it happened or even who exactly was present at the time. She also doesn’t know how she got there or how she got home and she doesn’t know who threw the party. Sounds less than credible to me.
It will also not surprise you that Ford is a Democrat who has marched against President Trump. She is also opposed to Kavanaugh on political grounds.
Sixty-five women who knew Judge Kavanaugh in high school are now speaking up for his character. They have written a letter supporting Kavanaugh to the Senate Judiciary Committee defending his character. The letter stated that Judge Kavanaugh has always “treated women with respect.”
From the Patriot Journal:
“But many on the Left do not care about these facts and have already decided that Kavanaugh is guilty.
“They are now demanding that Kavanaugh’s nomination be denied, despite the fact that in America we have a right to due process and the presumption of innocence.
“Interestingly, not all on the Left seem convinced that Ford’s story is accurate, and one prominent Democrat just outright admitted that she doesn’t know if Ford is telling the truth.
From colleague Connor Marley. Feinstein on Ford. Says Ford "is a woman that has been, I think, profoundly impacted, on this..I can't say that everything is truthful. I don't know."
— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) September 18, 2018
“There you have it. If Senator Feinstein really thought this claim of Ford’s were true, she would have released Ford’s letter when she received it months ago.
“Instead Feinstein sat on this information and released it at the 11th hour in a desperate attempt to stop Kavanaugh from being nominated.
“Feinstein also stated that Ford “did not want to go public” with her accusation, further casting doubt on Ford’s credibility.
“For his part, Kavanaugh is stating he has never even met his accuser.”
Feinstein to Fox on Ford when asked if the accusation will impact how mbrs would vote on Kavanaugh: "I know she did not want to go public. That's why I made the letter. That was taken out of my control"
— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) September 18, 2018
Feinstein can’t have it both ways here. On the one hand, she accuses Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct, while stating that she can’t vouch for everything Ford is saying as truthful. Obviously, Feinstein knows it isn’t or would not be confessing her doubt here. Her statement did set the Washington swamp on fire though.
This is very reminiscent of the Clarence Thomas mess when he had to go through his hearings to become a Supreme Court Justice. Anita Hill accused Justice Thomas of sexual harassment during his confirmation hearing back in 1991. She claimed it happened years before that though… not decades like Ford is stretching for here. This is sheer desperation and obstructionism on the Democrats’ part.
Thomas was painted as some kind of monster back then with lies and contradictions. But it didn’t stick and Thomas is now arguably the strongest constitutional originalist on the Supreme Court.
Feinstein to Fox when asked what will happen if Ford doesn't appear Monday. "I have no say. It's all up to the Republican(s)…"
— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) September 18, 2018
I expect Kavanaugh will be confirmed before the midterm elections. Grassley has offered a public or private hearing to Ford. At first, she refused, then she insisted on an FBI investigation and now she is demanding more witnesses. The ones I have heard are not doing her any favors but who knows who could be dredged up and convinced into saying whatever here.
Let’s hope that Ford follows Hill into disgraced obscurity. Kavanaugh does not deserve this unwarranted attack and the Democrats should be deeply ashamed over this.
After Major Upset In Texas Election, The 2018 Wave Is Confirmed
This hasn't happened in 139 years!
Melania Bravely Shows Up Solo With Big Surprise For Everyone Who Trashed Her For Weeks
Her haters were freaking out
Chuck Schumer Thinks Rules Don’t Apply To Him On Flight, Immediately Gets Taught Brutal Lesson
Who does he think he is!?
Corvette Driver Rolls Window Down & Flips Guy The Bird – Will Never Do That Again!
It's getting REALLY nasty out there! WOW!
Trump Deported Major Celebrity Who Had It Coming – NOBODY Is Above The Law!
Time is finally up!