Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

News

WATCH: Liberals Protest ICE… As ICE Busts a Human Sex Trafficking Ring

Sorry to break up your nasty party, but ICE has a job to do!

Published

on

Just when you thought the liberals could be anymore senseless, they go and do this. While ICE was busting up an alleged human sex trafficking ring, the mindless sheep known as liberals were busy protesting the ICE agents/officers as they basically saved people from being forced into a life of the deranged inhumane treatment known as human trafficking. It’s one thing to be a prostitute and get paid, but the people who are forced into the sex-trade, many of whom are children, live a life of terror and if ICE is rescuing people from this depraved world of inhumanity, then why on Earth would anyone dare protest and get in the way? It’s because liberals know no boundaries. They are so self-indulged with their mindless agenda that they can’t possibly process a logical thought that says “hey, those cops are busting up a horrible crime and saving people, maybe we should protest them later” – nope. That’s too hard.

The protest was caught on video by mainstream news networks and posted all over social media. The outrage has been livid. How dare people stop or get in the way of law enforcement from doing their job and potentially saving lives of people who have lived in really horrific conditions, trapped and used like rag dolls for whatever sick deviant and humiliating torture they can think of. If a conservative stopped the police from protecting a liberal, then they would lose their minds. Thankfully the conservatives are the more respectful crowd who knows how to react accordingly to situations. They respond on social media with their commentary and remind people of who the intolerant group of deviates really is.

If you’re protesting ICE busting a human trafficking ring, then maybe you’re just mad they’re breaking up your fun. It makes you wonder if these protesters are in on the crime. The Democrats protesting ICE video is disturbing and serves as a daily reminder about how messed up their dopey agenda is.

Trending: Sarah Sanders Laughs In Hateful CNN Host’s Face After Catching Him In Huge Lie During Live Interview

“The Oakland Police Department confirmed to the CBS station that the operation had nothing to do with immigration enforcement and the agents were acting on a federal search warrant obtained during an ongoing criminal investigation into juvenile sex trafficking.

ICE was seen leading two people out of the house with blankets over their heads to protect their identities.

“ICE is not welcome in this country. HS is not welcome,” said another neighbor, Adley Penner. “I don’t support what they do. I think it is a blasphemy.”

Protesters also wrote, “We love our neighbors” and “OPD [Oakland Police Department] is a disgrace” on the ground in chalk.

Several politicians have called for scrapping ICE recently after outrage over the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” policy for illegal immigrants, which resulted in children being separated from their parents as the adults were prosecuted.

Democrat Kirsten Gillibrand of New York became the first sitting senator to support abolishing the agency last week. “I believe you should get rid of it, start over, reimagine it and build something that actually works,” she said in announcing her stance. She was soon joined by Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts.

“People are smuggled and trafficked, while children are sexually exploited at home and abroad,” ICE’s website states. “Most ICE offices and programs have a role in preventing terrorism. Several are on the front lines of this effort, either identifying dangerous persons before they enter the U.S. or finding them as they violate immigration or customs laws. ICE also works to prevent the illegal export of U.S. technology that could be used or repurposed to do harm.”

What happened to using their brains before their emotions? It’s like the facts don’t ever matter and they just let their liberal feelings take over, usually being wrong, intolerant, and absurd in everything they do. Can you believe people are protesting ICE while they’re breaking up a human trafficking problem? That is senseless on levels that we can’t even comprehend. Do you think the protesters went home and thought “wow, that wasn’t very smart” or did they go home thinking “I really did something special today!”

For starters, no one really cares what protesters have to say. Protesters are like gnats who swarm around things for no reason. They’re annoying, make no sense, and are easy to knock out of the air. If you ask a protester what they’re protesting, then half the time they don’t even have an intelligent answer. Sometimes they might, but a lot of the time they just refrain from properly answering the question or they yell whatever chant they’re making up at the time. Some of them think protesting counts as doing something, but protesting is actually doing nothing.

Protesting is the fake way to make things change. Since protesters are looked down upon in society, they don’t really make a change – they just think they do. If a liberal really wants to make a change, then they’ll sign up to be a politician and change things from the inside. If people want to make ICE better, then join ICE and be a better agent than everyone else. If people want to abolish ICE (not gonna happen) then just forget about it and move to a country where there is no ICE.

ICE is here to stay and it’s time for people to stop having meltdowns and start following the law.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

News

Trump Just Blindsided Muslims In Bold Move Overnight, He’s Done

The White House will be notifying lawmakers of the president’s decision

Published

on

There are now several reports stating that President Donald Trump will be canceling the $200 million worth of foreign aid that was set aside to “stabilize” the war-torn nation of Syria.

The AP is reporting that officials with knowledge of the move have said that the White House will be notifying lawmakers of the president’s decision to withhold the funding and spend it elsewhere.

Here is more on this aid package via The Daily Caller:

“President Donald Trump’s administration will withdraw funding for aid programs in northwestern Syria, according to reports from administration officials.

The funding cuts are to the State Department’s “stabilization” programs in northwestern Syria, reported CBS News, citing administration officials. The programs include countering violent extremism, supporting independent media, as well as strengthening local civic and government institutions.

At Trump’s request, the State Department has been reviewing areas in Syria where the U.S. can scale back its financial commitments while focusing its efforts on areas liberated from the Islamic State. As the programs in northwestern Syria are phased out in the coming months, the money will be shifted to help support the counter-ISIS mission in northeast Syria.

The move to cut funding for northwestern Syria comes after Trump froze over $200 million in recovery aid for the entire country in late March. State Department officials said the latest cuts are “distinct from that amount.”

The State Department told CBS that “$200 million of stabilization assistance for Syria is currently under review at the request of the President.”

“Distinct from that amount, U.S. assistance for programs in northwest Syria are being freed up to provide potential increased support for priorities in northeast Syria, as will be determined by the outcome of the ongoing assistance review, including the D-ISIS campaign and stabilization efforts,” according to the report.

Because it has already been cleared of ISIS militants, northwestern Syria is not seen as a priority for the Trump administration, which has sought a narrower mission of fighting the remnants of ISIS in the country’s eastern half. The northwest is also an extraordinarily complex place, partially under Syrian government control but also home to Idlib, a rebel stronghold, and Afrin, where Turkish forces have been battling U.S.-backed Kurdish militia groups.

Washington has provided almost $900 million in non-lethal and stabilization aid to Syrian assistance since 2012, according to the State Department. Funding for humanitarian aid, which is distinct from the stabilization programs, will continue, administration officials said.

“We remain committed to countering ISIS and al-Qaida, in Syria and elsewhere,” a State Department official told Axios. “We will continue to provide life-saving, needs based, humanitarian assistance to vulnerable Syrians, including those in northwest Syria.”

The $200 million in recovery aid was originally pledged by the former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson at a February meeting of the US.-led coalition to defeat ISIS. But we are now starting to learn that only weeks later, the White House ordered the State Department to delay the funds pending the outcome of a spending review.

The Daily Caller reports:

“The cancellation of stabilization funding is in line with Trump’s inclination to avoid a leading role in the Syrian war. While he has stopped short of withdrawing the roughly 2,000 U.S. troops deployed to Syria, he has repeatedly signaled a desire to let other governments take the lead in post-war reconstruction.

The loss of U.S. funding will be more than offset by an additional $300 million pledged by coalition partners, including $100 million from Saudi Arabia, according to State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert.

“Many coalition partners have made pledges and contributions in recent months and the United States appreciates all partners who have stepped up to support this critical effort,” she told the AP.

The proper extent of U.S. involvement in Syria has been an open question in Washington for several years, but the debate has taken on new urgency as Syrian President Bashar al-Assad nears victory in the seven-year war. Backed by Russian and Iranian forces, Assad has regained control of most of central and southern Syria, leaving only pockets of rebel territory in the northwest and a U.S.-backed Kurdish autonomous region in the east.”

The cancellation of stabilization funding is just one more promise kept by the Trump White House. Where he pledged to avoid having the U.S. take a leading role in the Syrian war. Although he did not withdraw the roughly 2,000 U.S. troops deployed to Syria nor did he mention any withdrawal in the future, he has repeatedly said he his goal is to let other governments take the lead in the post-war reconstruction of a nation which is far from being stable.

Although the loss of these funds will be felt it will be offset by an additional $300 million which has already been pledged by coalition partners. One of which includes Saudi Arabia who has pledged $100 million.

The AP is reporting that in acknowledgment of the changing of power the White House plans to tap James Jeffrey as special envoy to Syria. Jeffrey is a former U.S. ambassador to Turkey and a career foreign service officer. Jeffrey will hold the title of “special representative for Syrian engagement” and report directly to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo or the President.

Continue Reading

News

Federal Judge Drops Crushing Anvil On Mueller Investigation, Delivers Trump Victory

He was appointed by Ronald Reagan

Published

on

The jury is currently locked in deliberations in the trial of former Trump campaign executive, 69-year-old Paul Manafort as mainstream media outlets The Washington Post, New York Times, AP, CNN, NBC, Politico, and Buzzfeed all requested the Court release the names and addresses of jurors. Manafort is accused of earning more than $60 million as a political consultant in Ukraine, and that he “failed to report a significant percentage of” on his tax returns, therefore defrauding the IRS. Manafort was targeted as part of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team of investigators looking into the supposed collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

U.S. Senior District Judge T.S. Ellis appointed by Republican President Ronald Reagan and is among a small, select handful of judges in America that know just how deep down the rabbit hole the deepest secrets of the Russia investigation go. He denied the motion from media organizations to make public the names of the jurors in the trial, saying he personally has faced “criticism and threats” and does not want the same for jurors. Ellis cited the “peace and safety” of the jurors and “the integrity of the process” in denying the motion, then revealed to the packed courtroom that he is now under 24/7 protection from the U.S. Marshals as a result of the threats he is currently facing stemming from this trial.

“I have the Marshals’ protection. I don’t even go to the hotel alone. I’ve received criticism and threats,” Ellis said, “I’d imagine jurors would, too.”

Ellis added – “I had no idea this case excited this emotion. I had no idea how this case would be perceived by the public and the press.”

When Manafort’s team of attorneys asked him, unsuccessfully, to dismiss a slew of charges against their client accusing him of tax evasion and bank fraud, Ellis demanded Mueller’s office hand over, without any redactions, an otherwise highly classified memorandum containing the scope of his authority to investigate Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman and other crimes. Ellis noted his concern of the “unfettered power” seemingly possessed by Mueller in probing ties between President Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia.

Judge Ellis is having none of it, as Reuters reports

A federal judge said Special Counsel Robert Mueller should not have “unfettered power” in probing ties between President Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, and accused Mueller of using criminal cases to pressure Trump’s allies to turn against him.

At a tense hearing in a federal court in Virginia on Friday, U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III sharply questioned whether Mueller exceeded his authority in filing tax and bank fraud charges against Trump’s former campaign manager, Paul Manafort.

Ellis said the indictment appeared to be a way for Mueller to leverage Manafort into providing information about Trump.

“The vernacular is to sing,” he said.

“You don’t really care about Mr. Manafort,” the judge said. “You really care about what information Mr. Manafort can give you to lead to Mr. Trump” and his eventual prosecution or impeachment.

“It’s unlikely you’re going to persuade me the special counsel has unfettered power to do whatever he wants,” Ellis, who was appointed by Republican President Ronald Reagan, said at a hearing on Manafort’s motion to dismiss the Virginia charges.”

Like most motions to dismiss, Manafort’s was initially viewed as a long-shot bid to win his freedom and get out from under Mueller’s thumb. Charged with an obscure law in place since the 1930s under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, Manafort is quite literally being tried for criminal charges under an obscure law that has been used only six times before, for a crime of which surely more than half of Washington is currently guilty. Normally such a violation in nearly all cases is treated as a regulatory violation and punished with fines at best.

Of note, Democratic darling and lobbyist, Tony Podesta, brother of Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager John Podesta, was guilty of the same crime, yet not one single federal prosecutor saw fit to bring charges against him, and Mueller himself offered him immunity, while continuing the trial against Manafort for the exact same “crimes.” Yes, there are issues of tax evasion, allegedly hiding income, and depositing money in offshore banks, but not one single bit of those “crimes” relates to anything remotely involving alleged Russian collusion to elect Donald Trump president during the election of 2016.

According to Judge Andrew Napolitano, “The criminal charges themselves clearly don’t match up to the original purpose of the investigation. Both were accused of working as foreign agents and failing to report that status to the federal government, using shell corporations to launder income and obstruction of justice by lying to the federal government. The alleged crimes of Manafort and Gates appear to have nothing to do with Trump, nor have they any facial relationship to the Russians. So why were these two indicted by a grand jury hearing evidence about alleged American assistance to Russian interference with the 2016 presidential campaign?”

Continue Reading




Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend