Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Connect with us

Well, Well, Well Anti-Kavanaugh Protester Came Clean On Live TV, Revealed Who She’s Really Working For



Globalist billionaire George Soros has a history of meddling in American affairs, of sowing discord, and funding various protest groups as a means to circumvent Conservative and Republican ideologies. Soros’ Open Society Policy Center (OSPC) has contributed millions of dollars in a concerted effort to stop Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Daily Caller reports –

“OSPC is practically indistinct from the Open Society Foundations (OSF), Soros’ philanthropic and grant-giving network. OSPC has no employees of its own, according to the Center’s 2016 tax forms. Rather, Foundations employees are compensated for any work done for the Center. Said compensation is determined by the OSF and documented in OSF’s internal records.

“OSPC has no employees,” the form reads. “Employees of Open Society [Foundations], a related section 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization, perform services for OSPC. OSPC advances funds to Open Society [Foundations] for their services based on the time they spend on OSPC matters. Their compensation is determined by Open Society [Foundations], and is based on market comparability data and is documented in Open Society [Foundations’] records.”

Trending: Sarah Sanders Laughed In CNN Host’s Face After Catching Him In SICK Lie During Live Interview

This coalition of activist organizations consisting of groups such as the Women’s March, the Center for Popular Democracy (CPD), Demand Justice, and Housing Works have scheduled and created near constant disruptions at the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings as part of a concerted effort to derail the confirmation process. Cash from these donor-funded groups is put into a slush fund of sorts going towards the protesters’ post-and-forfeit payments. It is simply a small cash sum paid to resolve low-level misdemeanor crimes and avoid jail time.

Yet mainstream media outlets accuse President Donald Trump of spreading conspiracy theories for citing what is readily available via public record. President Trump roundly criticized anti-Kavanaugh protesters after they chose to confront Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) and accused her of paid by Soros.

President Trump tweeted – “The very rude elevator screamers are paid professionals only looking to make Senators look bad. Don’t fall for it! Also, look at all of the professionally made identical signs. Paid for by Soros and others. These are not signs made in the basement from love! #Troublemakers

Mainstream media outlets such as the Daily Beast, Think Progress, and others are functioning as little more than propaganda mouthpieces for the leftist progressives and the Democratic party. They accused President Trump of merely peddling a conspiracy and expressed utter disbelief that anyone could possibly think that these anti-Kavanaugh protesters might have been paid by Soros.

Yet, one protestor actually openly admitted on MSNBC to being just that – a paid protestor on Soros’ payroll.

According to the Daily Caller

“One of the two protesters who confronted Flake in the elevator is Ana Maria Archila, an executive director of the Center for Popular Democracy (CPD). The other protester, Maria Gallagher, is an activist with the group. The CPD is indeed heavily funded by George Soros through the Open Society Foundation.

The Center for Popular Democracy’s homepage features an image of Archila and Gallagher yelling at Flake and urges supporters to “join” Archila.”

During an interview on MSNBC Friday, Archila confirmed that she works for CPD and did not deny Trump’s characterization of her efforts.

“Are you a paid professional?” MSNBC anchor Hallie Jackson asked Archila.

“I work for a community organization, I work for a network of community organizations,” Archila said, adding that it is her “job” to organize people into action.

“If the president wants to know whether I work for a social justice organization, the answer is yes. And I’ve worked for a social justice organization since I was 23. That’s not news,” she asserted.”

As Conservative Review notes, “The competition for most ridiculous take on the Kavanaugh saga is huge. Here’s why New York Times op-ed columnist David Leonhardt just earned a nomination for the award. He called exposing the astroturf protests against Kavanaugh and GOP senators “anti-Semitic.”

On Friday, Maria Bartoromo asked Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, “Do you believe George Soros is behind all of this? Paying these people to get you and your colleagues in elevators?” Grassley answered, “I have heard so many people believe that. I tend to believe it.” Later in the day, Trump tweeted the accusation.

Then Leonhardt jumped in by tweet, “Let’s be clear here: Charles Grassley is a United States Senator. He is responsible for his words. And his words here amount to an anti-Semitic smear.”

Say what? Just because George Soros is Jewish doesn’t mean that this is an “anti-Semitic smear.” Maybe Leonhardt missed the CNN report from yesterday where Joe Johns reported, “They are brought here by an umbrella group or number of umbrella groups and come from all sorts of different progressive and liberal causes.”

The New York Times claims that Trump made the claim “without evidence.” The paper used as its evidence the following paragraph.

‘One of the women who confronted Mr. Flake, Ana Maria Archila, the executive director of the Center for Popular Democracy, a New York-based liberal organizing group, said she had not been paid.’

Let’s unpack that. The woman they say claims she wasn’t paid is the PAID executive director of an organizing group. It’s literally her job to organize these types of protests. Archila’s compensation in 2015, according to the organization’s IRS form 990 was $150,221.

Oh, and according to Fox News, her organization regularly receives grants from George Soros’ Open Society Foundations. Forbes reported in this week’s annual Forbes 400 that Soros transferred $18 billion to this foundation over the past year.

The Times has updated its reporting and changed the title, all without an editor’s note. The paper now reports that Archila is paid by a Soros-funded group but says she wasn’t paid expressly to be there. That’s insane.”



Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

HUGE: Supreme Court About To Put Smack Down On Large Lib Tech Giants – Facebook And Twitter




* By

The leftists are totalitarians. They demand absolute power. To dissent is verboten and dangerous because the truth shines light on the tyranny of fascism.

Section 47 CFR covers this. These companies are “communications systems” as defined by that law. They are NOT allowed to censor messaging on those platforms. Time we stop allowing dems to censor free speech. Sue them!

From The Gateway Pundit:

For over a year The Gateway Pundit has spoken out about how the tech and social media giants are censoring and eliminating conservative publishers and conservative content.

*** In September The Gateway Pundit founder Jim Hoft testified to Congress on Facebook targeting of conservative publishers and content.

The Gateway Pundit has repeatedly reported on tech giant censorship of conservative content.

These powerful tech firms act as gatekeepers and prevent conservative content from being shared online.

In 2016 we were one of the few conservative sites that supported candidate Trump – along with Breitbart, The Drudge Report, Infowars, Zero Hedge and Conservative Treehouse. We are proud of our efforts to report the truth that led to Trump’s historic win.

In 2017 Harvard and Columbia Journalism Review found that The Gateway Pundit was the 4th most influential conservative news source in the 2016 election.
Because of this we were targeted and have seen our numbers related to Facebook and Twitter decline dramatically.

In February Facebook launched another algorithm change to their platform. With the changes we saw our traffic dwindle even further.

The algorithmic change caused President Donald Trump’s engagement on Facebook posts to plummet a whopping 45%.

Facebook is doing this to a number of top conservative sites.
A recent Pew Study found that 71% of Americans see how tech giants are censoring political content.

A Gateway Pundit June study of top conservative news outlets found that Facebook eliminated 93% of traffic to top conservative websites.

Facebook began eliminating conservative content after the 2016 election.

Here are the full results from our study.

We have another study on Facebook censorship coming out in July.

Report: Facebook Eliminates 93% of Traffic to Top Conservative Websites by Jim Hoft on Scribd
But there may be some hope for conservatives and free speech advocates.

The US Supreme Court has decided to hear a case on whether users can challenge social media companies on free speech grounds.

CNBC reported:

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that could determine whether users can challenge social media companies on free speech grounds.

The case, Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, No. 17-702, centers on whether a private operator of a public access television network is considered a state actor, which can be sued for First Amendment violations.

The case could have broader implications for social media and other media outlets. In particular, a broad ruling from the high court could open the country’s largest technology companies up to First Amendment lawsuits.

That could shape the ability of companies like Facebook, Twitter and Alphabet’s Google to control the content on their platforms as lawmakers clamor for more regulation and activists on the left and right spar over issues related to censorship and harassment.

The Supreme Court accepted the case on Friday. It is the first case taken by a reconstituted high court after Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation earlier this month.

Continue Reading

Trump Just Slapped Back HARD At AP For Deliberately Misleading Readers With Sick Headline




* By

It never ends with these leftists. When do they ever not lie about things? This is the democrat way. Bravo to President Trump for not backing down to these lying, fake journalists..who are pretty much leftist activists.

They hate Trump because he won’t cower to them. These parasites will never go away. But never back down when they are spreading fake news.

From CDP:

During an interview with the Associated Press on Tuesday, the President outlined his upcoming midterm election strategy and later blasted the fact that the AP deliberately misinterpreted his words to create a ‘fake news’ headline.

He said they ‘couldn’t help themselves’ from spewing propaganda, and many Americans agree after reading the article.

When speaking from the Oval Office, the President said he felt voter enthusiasm currently rivaled 2016, and was optimistic that his loyal supporters will vote.

When faced with hostile questions about GOP chances, the President said, “No, I think I’m helping people,” Trump said. “I don’t believe anybody’s ever had this kind of an impact.”

AP reported the President, “spoke on a range of subjects, defending Saudi Arabia from growing condemnation over the case of a missing journalist, accusing his longtime attorney Michael Cohen of lying under oath.”

When journalists asked if it was appropriate to insult a woman’s appearance, referring to the fact that Trump called porn actress Stormy Daniels ‘horseface,’ Trump responded, “You can take it any way you want.”

When pressured to call Saudi Arabia to account for the disappearance of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, President Trump stated, “Well, I think we have to find out what happened first… Here we go again with, you know, you’re guilty until proven innocent. I don’t like that. We just went through that with Justice Kavanaugh. And he was innocent all the way.”

As expected by many people, the AP journalist also brought up the possibility of democrats calling for impeachment if they win the House, but the President said he’d ‘handle it very well.’

And although he reiterated his frustrations with Attorney General Jeff Sessions over the special counsel investigation, aka ‘witch hunt,’ the President said, “I could fire him whenever I want to fire him, but I haven’t said that I was going to.”

A number of conservatives believe that the so-called feud between AG Sessions and Trump is really just a blind to distract the propaganda wing of the left in America, and that there is plenty of behind the scenes activity being carried out against the scandal-plagued previous administration.

The president remained strong on debated climate change saying, “scientists on both sides of the issue.”

“But what I’m not willing to do is sacrifice the economic well-being of our country for something that nobody really knows,” Trump correctly argued.

He added, “I have a natural instinct for science, and I will say that you have scientists on both sides of the picture.”

Repeatedly reminding journalists of his remarkable, in fact, historic achievements during the first two years in office, the president confirmed he’d be seeking another term because there was “always more work to do.”

“The new motto is Keep America Great,” President Trump said. “I don’t want somebody to destroy it because I can do a great job, but the wrong person coming in after me sitting right at this desk can destroy it very quickly if they don’t do the right thing. So no, I’m definitely running.”

This journalist, when reading the AP story was struck by a few things: the snide insinuations that President Trump has not achieved historic numbers in unemployment and economic growth, the way they called him a liar about climate change, and the fact that they rarely (perhaps once) actually used ‘President,’ insultingly calling him Trump throughout the article.

Most people think it’s ‘great’ that President Trump called them on their headline deception.

Continue Reading

Latest Articles

Become an insider!

Thank you for your interest in receiving the Right Wing News newsletter. To subscribe, please submit your email address below.

Send this to a friend